Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Benjamin Barber v. State of Oregon, et al
as 20-35051
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BENJAMIN BARBER
Defendant: SIMON, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon and ACOSTA, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of State et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant: United States Department of Commerce, Michael R. Pompeo, U.S. State Department and others
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Washington, et al v. Defense Distributed, et al
as 20-35030
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED
Defendant: DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-15044
Defendant / Appellee: MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, RYAN D. MCCARTHY, senior official performing the duties of the Secretary of the Army and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Amicus Curiae: FORMER U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, EL PASO COUNTY, FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS and others
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-17502
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, RICHARD V. SPENCER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy and others
Amicus Curiae: ANDY BARR, U.S. Representative
State of California, et al v. USEPA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-17480
Defendant / Appellant: ANDREW WHEELER, Acting Aministrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW MEXICO and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant: E. SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator, U.S. EPA
Barber v. State of Oregon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv01631
Defendant: Hon. Judge Simon, Attorney General of North Carolina, Attorney General of West Virginia and others
Plaintiff: Benjamin Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of California et al v. Bernhardt et al
as 4:2019cv06013
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Nevada, State of Maryland and others
Defendant: National Marine Fisheries Service, United States Fish And Wildlife Service, Wilbur Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
John Robert Demos et al v. The State Attorney General of California et al
as 2:2019cv08043
Defendant: The Governor of The State of California, The Governor of The State of South Dakota, The Virginia Company and others
Plaintiff: John R Demos, Jr., The Society of T.R.U.T.H. and John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of California et al v. Kevin K. McAleenan
as 2:2019cv07390
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, State of Minnesota, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae: Save the Children Federation, Inc., American Medical Association, First Focus on Children and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?