Cases 51 - 60 of 3,143
Poye-Perez v. Diaz et al
as 3:2023cv04933
Plaintiff:
Serguey Poye-Perez
Defendant:
R Diaz, K Allison, R Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2023cv04497
Plaintiff:
Phillip Arnold
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arnold v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01553
Plaintiff:
Ashley G. Arnold
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bw Diversity -Breach of Warranty
Marlin Penn v. State of California et al
as 2:2023cv06902
Plaintiff:
Marlin Penn
Defendant:
State of California, Ken Lamb, Sergeant Gil Kranke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hugues Gervat v. Robert Chapek et al
as 2:2023cv06389
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Robert Chapek, Christine M. McCarthy, Kareem Daniel and others
Arnold v. County of San Diego Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv01396
Petitioner:
Chad Arnold
Respondent:
County of San Diego Corporation, San Diego County Board of Supervisors, Kelly Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Katz et al
as 3:2023cv01366
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Arnold Katz and Wendy Katz
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability - Authorization to collect via civil action
John Arnold, et al v. Michael Mittman
as 23-55653
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ARNOLD, an individual and MICHAEL JOHNSTON, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MITTMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Nabb v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08486
Plaintiff:
Arnold Nabb
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
