Cases 51 - 60 of 1,980
Sherman Way Gardens, Ltd. v. Nikolay Arkhipov et al
as 2:2023cv06470
Plaintiff:
Sherman Way Gardens, Ltd. doing business as Olive Tree Apartments
Defendant:
Nikolay Arkhipov, Natalia Feschuk and Does 1 to 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carrillo v. The Standard Fire Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv05583
Plaintiff:
Sherman Carrillo
Defendant:
The Standard Fire Insurance Company doing business as Travelers Insurance and The Standard Fire Insurance Company a foreign corporation doing business in Washington doing business as Travelers Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Roberto Herrera v. CDCR Staff, et al
as 23-55515
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERTO HERRERA
Respondent / Appellee:
CDCR STAFF and S. SHERMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
