Cases 51 - 60 of 64
Villegas v. Schulteis et al
as 3:2009cv00820
Defendant:
L. L. Schulteis, M. Carrasco, S. Hopkins and others
Plaintiff:
Santos A. Villegas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Rogers Jackson v. Matthew Cate et al
as 2:2009cv01326
Plaintiff:
Paul Rogers Jackson
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Robert Ayers, Jr, F. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Las Vegas Co. Clerks et al
as 2:2008cv01602
Plaintiff:
Demario D. Walker
Defendant:
Las Vegas Co. Clerks, United States Army and United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02651
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bobby Walker v. Bentley Evans, et al
as 08-56814
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY D. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
BENTLEY K. EVANS, VALICIA EVANS, Owners, NANCY WHITE, Director of Occupancy and others
Walker et al v. San Diego County Clerks et al
as 3:2008cv01504
Plaintiff:
Demario D Walker and Marshall R Branch
Defendant:
San Diego County Clerks, Attorney General of the State of California, Governor of California and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walker v. USA
as 3:2008cv01314
Plaintiff:
Demario D Walker
Defendant:
USA, Attorney General of the State of California and Governor State of California
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walker v. Van Boening
as 2:2008cv01076
Petitioner:
Marvin D. Walker
Respondent:
Ron Van Boening
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Sisto et al
as 2:2008cv01609
Plaintiff:
Lacedric W Johnson
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, J. Tilton, A Traquina and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robert D. Walker v. Michael J. Astrue
as 5:2008cv00577
Plaintiff:
Robert D Walker
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
