Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Deetz #140453 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00489
Plaintiff:
Garrett J Deetz
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Anna Jacobs, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Garrett v. Deaz et al
as 4:2012cv00890
Plaintiff:
Tracy Garrett
Defendant:
M Deaz, Unknown Hayden, Unknown McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rushing v. United States of America et al
as 4:2012cv00722
Plaintiff:
Garrett M Rushing
Defendant:
United States of America, Unknown Heard, Unknown Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jennings v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2011cv01747
Plaintiff:
Laura Jennings
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Charles L Ryan, Unknown Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2011cv01427
Plaintiff:
Erin Sullivan
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of , Bryan Welsh , Unknown Welsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boyd v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2011cv00828
Plaintiff:
Donald E Boyd
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2010cv02554
Plaintiff:
Donald E Boyd
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rodriguez v. Peterson et al
as 2:2010cv01463
Plaintiff:
Vincent Edward Rodriguez
Defendant:
Garrett Peterson, Tempe Police Department and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
