Cases 51 - 60 of 71
Daniel Borden, Sr. v. R. Gautier, et al
as 10-17822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL F. BORDEN, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
R. GAUTIER, R. HITCHCOCK, S. GLEN and others
Borden v. Gautier
as 2:2010cv02435
Defendant:
R. Gautier, R. Hitchcock, S. Glen and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel F. Borden, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantu' v. Hitchcock et al
as 2:2010cv03021
Plaintiff:
Ismael Cantu
Defendant:
Kathleen E Hitchcock and Granger Municipal Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyle Hitchcock v. Pathfinders of San Diego, Inc, et al
as 09-56778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYLE JOHN HITCHCOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
PATHFINDERS OF SAN DIEGO, INC and STAN STANLEY
Hitchcock v. City of Oakland
as 3:2009cv01472
Plaintiff:
Virginia Hitchcock
Defendant:
City of Oakland, City of Oakland, City of Oakland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hitchcock v. City of Oakland
as 4:2009cv01472
Plaintiff:
Virginia Hitchcock
Defendant:
City of Oakland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knapp v. Arlitz et al
as 1:2009cv00412
Plaintiff:
Eric Charles Rodney Knapp
Defendant:
Arlitz, Matthew Cate, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America et al v. Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp. et al
as 2:2009cv00866
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Defendant:
Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp., Arvinmeritor, Inc, Edward R. Kipling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Hitchcock v. Stanley et al
as 3:2008cv02007
Plaintiff:
Lyle J Hitchcock
Defendant:
Stan Stanley, Richard Burtz and Pathfinders of San Diego, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Grogan v. City of Millbrae et al
as 3:2008cv05534
Plaintiff:
Michael Grogan and Michael Grogan
Defendant:
City of Millbrae, Ralph Jaeck, Jeff Killian and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
