Cases 51 - 60 of 2,515
Ian LaMonte Cormier v. The People Of The State Of California et al
as 5:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Ian LaMonte Cormier
Defendant:
The People Of The State Of California, Greg Horta, Detective Leon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Ramos v. Tyler
as 2:2024cv00946
Petitioner:
Salvador Ramos
Respondent:
Thomas Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Weston, et al.
as 24-1856
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
W. WESTON, A. CAMPIN, Judge, Martinez Court - Contra Costa County, C. BIRCH and others
Ruiz Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1805
Petitioner:
JULIA MARINA RUIZ RAMOS and CHELSEY YAHAIRA FELIPE RUIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jackson v. Quick, et al.
as 24-1740
Plaintiff:
CORNEL JACKSON
Defendant:
JASON QUICK, Watch Commander at Madera County Jail, ELIZABETH ALVAREZ, CSU Officer at Madera County Jail, LISETTE LOPEZ, Mailroom Officer at Madera County Jail and others
Castro Ramos v. Garland
as 24-1706
Petitioner:
LUIS ERASMO CASTRO RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramos Mariscal v. Garland
as 24-1710
Petitioner:
LUIS RODOLFO RAMOS MARISCAL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Aguilar #118162 v. Ramos et al
as 2:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Benito Aguilar
Defendant:
Albert Ramos, Gaughan Daniel and Daniel Gaughan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ellis v. Crivello et al
as 2:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
Benjamin F. Ellis
Defendant:
S. Crivello, J. Schultz, R. Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Ruben Ramos et al v. City of Burbank et al
as 2:2024cv01952
Plaintiff:
RUBEN NOEL RAMOS and DANNIELLE RAMOS
Other:
ESTATE OF RUBEN RAMOS
Defendant:
CITY OF BURBANK, BURBANK POLICE DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
