Cases 61 - 70 of 717
Cole Alan Chase et al v. International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers al
as 2:2020cv08841
Plaintiff:
Joseph Matthew Rachunok, Michael Combs, Shawn Lee Sherman and others
Defendant:
IAM TWU Association, John and Janes Does, Transport Workers Union of America AFL CIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Laborers International Union of North America, Local 1309, AFL-CIO v. Schultz Industrial Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06520
Defendant:
SCHULTZ INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY, A DIVISION OF CHEVRON U.S.A., INC., A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, Schultz Industrial Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, LOCAL 1309, AFL-CIO and Laborers International Union of North America, Local 1309, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
Neighbors for Environmental, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 20-72091
Petitioner:
NEIGHBORS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC and others
Respondent:
ANDREW WHEELER, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL REGAN, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL, HALOGENATED SOLVENTS INDUSTRY ALLIANCE, INC and N-METHYLPYRROLIDONE PRODUCERS GROUP, INC
Amicus Curiae:
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND
Samson Tug and Barge Co., Inc et al v. International Longshore and Warehouse Union et al
as 3:2020cv00108
Defendant:
International Longshore and Warehouse Union, Alaska Longshore Division and ILWU Unit 222
Plaintiff:
Marine Engineers' Beneficial, AFL-CIO and Samson Tug and Barge Co., Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Steven Masuo, et al v. AFSCME, et al
as 20-35355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACYN GALLAGHER, CRAIG LEECH, GLORIA CARLSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CORNELIUS EMPLOYEES UNION, AFSCME LOCAL 189, MARION EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 294 OF OREGON PUBLIC EMPLOYEES UNION, AFSCME, LOCAL 3336 and others
Long Beach Memorial Medical Center v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union
as 2:2020cv03799
Respondent:
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Insustrial and Service Workers International Union
Petitioner:
Long Beach Memorial Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00074
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Office & Professional Employees International Union, Local 29 v. Communications Workers of America, District 9
as 3:2020cv01940
Plaintiff:
Local 29, Office & Professional Employees International Union, AFL-CIO & CLC and Office & Professional Employees International Union, Local 29
Defendant:
Local 9410 Communications Workers of America, District 9 and Communications Workers of America, District 9
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Patricia Grossman v. Hawaii Government Employees' A, et al
as 20-15356
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICIA GROSSMAN
Defendant:
RUSSELL A. SUZUKI, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Hawaii
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID LASSNER, in his official capacity as President of the University of Hawaii, CLARE E. CONNORS, in her official capacity as Attorney General of Hawaii and HAWAII GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES' ASSOCIATION, AFSCME LOCAL 152,AFL-CIO
Oliver v. The Amalgamated Sugar Company, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00107
Plaintiff:
Ryan Clark Oliver
Defendant:
The Amalgamated Sugar Company, LLC and Bakery Confectionery Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers Inernational, AFL-CIO, Local 284G
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
