Cases 61 - 70 of 1,039
Stacy Hall v. Buddy Myotte, et al
as 23-35372
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STACY G. HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
BUDDY MYOTTE, ALVIN FODE, TRISDAN KOHUT and others
Costamagna v. McKesson Corp., et al
as 2:2023at00501
Plaintiff:
Heidi Costamagna
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and McKesson Medical Surgical Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Costamagna v. McKesson Corp., et al
as 2:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
Heidi Costamagna
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and McKesson Medical Surgical Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moret v. Bradford et al
as 2:2023cv00715
Plaintiff:
Andrew Moret
Defendant:
Judy Bradford, Ashley Clements, Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Allen et al
as 2:2023cv00694
Plaintiff:
Joshua Louis Taylor
Defendant:
Patrick Allen, Kate Brown, Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremy Braulick v. Paul Rees, et al
as 23-35331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY JOHN BRAULICK
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL REES, ERIC THOMAS, JODY COZBY and others
Grimsley v. Nike Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
Robert Alexander Grimsley
Defendant:
Nike Inc., Nicole Brown, Tim Welsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
James Ross v. Tyler Blewett, et al
as 23-35298
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR ROSS
Defendant / Appellee:
TYLER BLEWETT, KEN JESKE, SHAWN HAYWOOD and others
Whitaker v. Steward et al
as 2:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Stephen Whitaker
Defendant:
Heidi Steward, Steve Robbins, Bob Culp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
