Cases 61 - 70 of 412
Wells v. Penzone et al
as 2:2020cv01135
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Arizona Attorney General and Mariopa County Board of Supervisors
Plaintiff:
Roger Cornelius Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nieblas et al v. Porch.com Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv00171
Plaintiff:
Patrick Coco, Paul Ryals, Ann Taylor and others
Defendant:
Porch.com Incorporated, Matthew Ehrlichman, GoSmith Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Hill v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2020cv00603
Defendant:
J Rogers, Unknown Perry, L Tijerina and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Dwayne Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stables #334525 v. Fajardo et al
as 2:2020cv00619
Defendant:
Unknown Repp, Samuel L Rogers, David Fajardo and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Edward Stables
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2020cv00128
Defendant:
Corizon Health Incorporated, Unknown Royer, Arizona, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Womack #104328 v. Fajardo et al
as 2:2020cv00455
Defendant:
Unknown Repp, Samuel L Rogers, Unknown Metzler and others
Plaintiff:
David Kirby Womack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moran v. Baiardi et al
as 2:2020cv00429
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Timothy F Baiardi and Jeri Williams
Plaintiff:
Roger Moran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 3:2020cv08026
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, Unknown Parties, Bank of America NA and others
Plaintiff:
Doreene Watson and Estate of Roger A Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Rogers v. Citigroup Disability Plan et al
as 4:2020cv00003
Plaintiff:
Luz M Rogers
Defendant:
Citigroup Disability Plan and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hummel #330543 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv00010
Defendant:
Unknown Rogers, David Shinn and Unknown Murde
Plaintiff:
Richard Harold Hummel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
