Cases 71 - 80 of 112
Carlisle v. Russell
as 3:2012cv05439
Petitioner:
John Carlisle
Respondent:
Scott Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03440
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01435
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bell et al v. Arvin Meritor, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00131
Plaintiff:
Donald Bell and Sumiko Bell
Defendant:
Arvin Meritor, Inc., Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc., Bridgestone Firestone, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Anderson et al v. 24 Hour Fitness USA Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00098
Plaintiff:
Chris Anderson , Jennifer Bell , Priscilla Bell and others
Defendant:
24 Hour Fitness USA Inc and Sport and Fitness Clubs of America, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Midland National Life Insurance Company v. Richard Carlisle Johnson et al
as 2:2011cv05232
Defendant:
American Charitable Funding, Michael E Barnhill, Sara Burrage and others
Plaintiff:
Midland National Life Insurance Company
GENE KINKADE et al v. TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION et al
as 8:2011cv00804
Plaintiff:
CARLISLE B. KINKADE and GENE KINKADE
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. and others
Peter Tia v. Baker, et al
as 11-15689
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER RAY TIA
Defendant - Appellee:
BAKER, Lt., LINDA RIVERA, COSTA, A/CO and others
H.W. et al v Eastern Sierra Unified School District, et al
as 2:2011cv00531
Plaintiff:
H. W. and M. K.
Defendant:
Eastern Sierra Unified School District , Jason Reed , Cody Carlisle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
W.
as 2:2011at00265
Plaintiff:
H. W. and M. K.
Defendant:
Eastern Sierra Unified School District, Jason Reed, Cody Carlisle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
