Cases 71 - 80 of 1,359
McDaniels v. Shirley
as 3:2022cv02043
Petitioner:
Shelton T. McDaniels
Respondent:
Heather Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antonio Williams v. Ramadan, et al
as 22-15206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO LUIS WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
RAMADAN, Doctor at CSP, GILMORE, Nurse at CSP, KEN CLARK, Warden, Warden at CSP and others
Slaikeu v. Moses et al
as 3:2021cv00271
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Alexander Slaikeu
Defendant:
Richard Moses, Trey Taylor, Attorney General for the State of Alaska and others
Respondent:
Earl L. Houser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Williams v. Ramadan et al
as 1:2021cv01760
Plaintiff:
Antonio Luis Williams
Defendant:
Ramadan, Gilmore, Ken Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keshone Owens v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 21-17039
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KESHONE OWENS
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES DZURENDA, BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden, JEREMY BEAN, Warden and others
Defendant:
TONY CORDA, ADAM ENDEL, E. K. MCDANIEL and others
Dahir v. McDaniels et al
as 3:2021cv00487
Plaintiff:
Shane Micheal Dahir
Defendant:
E.K. McDaniels, James Cox, Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony McDaniel v. Theresa Cisneros
as 2:2021cv08831
Petitioner:
Anthony McDaniel
Respondent:
Theresa Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Phillip Hurbace, et al
as 21-10317
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PHILLIP D. HURBACE
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY ANTHONY MCDANIEL and SYLVIANE DELLA WHITMORE, AKA Sylviane Cordova
Joseph Antonetti v. E. McDaniels, et al
as 21-16687
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Defendant / Appellee:
E. K. MCDANIELS, R. BAKER, BYRNES, AKA Byrne and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
