Cases 71 - 80 of 6,739
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
LaRocca v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2323
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LAROCCA
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, MICHEL MOORE, Chief and others
Bledsoe v. Martinez, et al.
as 24-2198
Plaintiff:
DONNELL BLEDSOE
Defendant:
MARTINEZ, Sgt., LEATUGE, MICHELL and others
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Michelle Estelle Caldera v. A. Delacruz
as 2:2024cv02937
Petitioner:
Michelle Estelle Caldera
Respondent:
A. Delacruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Extend Time to File
Celillo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024at00422
Plaintiff:
Michelle Diana Celillo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
(SS) Celillo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01031
Plaintiff:
Michelle Diana Celillo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Gurner et al v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
John Gurner, Michelle Gurner, Claire Gurner and others
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Castello v. Quinstreet Pl, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Michelle Castello
Defendant:
Quinstreet Pl, Inc. doing business as Amone
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
