Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 222
Dennis Underwood v. Brad Cain
as 20-35491
Respondent / Appellee: BRAD CAIN, Superintendent Snake River Correctional Institute
Petitioner / Appellant: DENNIS BURTON UNDERWOOD
Lewis v. Cain We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00668
Respondent: Brad Cain
Petitioner: Quinton Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Swinney v. Cain We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00736
Petitioner: Craig Alan Swinney
Respondent: Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel Graybill v. Brad Cain
as 20-35444
Petitioner / Appellant: DANIEL G. GRAYBILL
Respondent / Appellee: BRAD CAIN
Grimsley v. Cain
as 2:2020cv00500
Petitioner: Robert Grimsley
Respondent: Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00501
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Scott Camirand v. Brad Cain, et al
as 20-35307
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL HILL, Individually and in his official capacity as a Correctional Lieutenant at the Snake River Correctional Institution, BRAD CAIN, Individually and in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Snake River Correctional Institution and JOHN DOES, 1-10; Individually and in their official capacities as employees of the Oregon Department of Corrections
Plaintiff / Appellant: SCOTT LEANDER CAMIRAND
Hugo Alvarez-Reyes v. Brad Cain
as 20-35308
Petitioner / Appellant: HUGO RUFINO ALVAREZ-REYES
Respondent / Appellee: BRAD CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Corr. Inst.
Raymundo Eusebio-Noriega v. Brad Cain
as 20-35153
Respondent / Appellee: BRAD CAIN, Superintendent Snake River Correctional Institution
Petitioner / Appellant: RAYMUNDO EUSEBIO-NORIEGA
Jones v. Suh et al
as 2:2020cv00488
Defendant: Joe DeCamp, Stuart Young, Judy Gilmore and others
Plaintiff: Clarence Eugene Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?