Cases 81 - 90 of 472
Peter Martinez v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-16529
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETER ROBLES MARTINEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO and STATE OF ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL
John Palmer v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-16526
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN PALMER
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO and STATE OF ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Michael Steel v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 09-16531
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL STEEL
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, DORA B. SCHRIRO and STATE OF ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jose Salas, Jr. v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-16509
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS SALAS, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO and STATE OF ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Torrefranca v. Ryan et al
as 2:2009cv01527
Plaintiff:
Delmo Figura Torrefranca
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Dora B Schriro, GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torrefranca v. Schriro et al
as 2:2009cv01526
Plaintiff:
Delmo Figura Torrefranca
Defendant:
Dora B. Schriro, Terry Goddard, Randall M Howe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melinda Valenzuela v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-16381
Petitioner - Appellant:
MELINDA GABRIELLA VALENZUELA
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO and STATE OF ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Castle v. Eurofresh, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv08114
Plaintiff:
William W Castle
Defendant:
Eurofresh, Inc., Arizona Department of Corrections, Dora B. Schriro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Hines v. Freeland et al
as 4:2009cv02834
Plaintiff:
James Lynn O'Hines
Defendant:
Jeff Freeland, George Galaza, James Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ball v. Schriro et al
as 4:2009cv00353
Petitioner:
Earl Ball
Respondent:
Dora B. Schriro and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
