Cases 81 - 90 of 273
Silas v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv01567
Petitioner:
Kirkland Renard Silas
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Thomas C Horne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maisano v. Horne et al
as 4:2013cv00731
Plaintiff:
Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant:
Thomas C Horne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maisano v. Horne et al
as 4:2013cv00707
Plaintiff:
Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant:
Thomas C Horne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blaise v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv01483
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Thomas C Horne
Petitioner:
Kevin Rochon Blaise
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glenn Winningham v. County of Navajo, et al
as 13-16448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN WINNINGHAM, house of fearn
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF NAVAJO, named as: County of Navajo, Inc., CAMMY DARRIS, Navajo County Assessor, LAURETTE JUSTMAN, Navajo County Recorder and others
Maisano v. Horne et al
as 4:2013cv00677
Plaintiff:
Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant:
Thomas C Horne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonas v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv01405
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Thomas C Horne
Petitioner:
Seon Deon Jonas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Madueno v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv01382
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Thomas C Horne
Petitioner:
Jorge Ernesto Madueno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maisano v. Horne et al
as 4:2013cv00553
Plaintiff:
Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant:
Thomas C Horne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin et al v. D'Andrea et al
as 3:2013cv08161
Plaintiff:
Marlene Baldwin , Robert George, Jr. , Andrew R Wilkenson and others
Defendant:
Michelle D'Andrea , Kevin Treadway and Thomas C Horne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
