Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 895
Bordin v. Rau, et al.
as 24-3139
Plaintiff: RICHARD BORDIN
Defendant: JON RAU and JOSH RAU
Martin v. Tewalt
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff: Walter B. Martin
Defendant: Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Capone v. Tewalt
as 1:2024cv00236
Petitioner: Charles Anthony Capone
Respondent: Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gulkarov, et al. v. Plum, PBC
as 24-2766
Plaintiff: LUDMILA GULKAROV, JANINE TORRENCE, KELLY MCKEON and others
Defendant: PLUM, PBC, a Delaware corporation
Josh Webber v. Damon Anthony Dash
as 2:2024cv03278
Plaintiff: Josh Webber
Defendant: Damon Anthony Dash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Sivak v. Ramirez, et al.
as 24-2395
Plaintiff: LACEY SIVAK
Defendant: RAMIREZ, Sergeant, ISCI, AARON FODGE, Prison Employee, R. FINDEISEN, Prison Employee and others
Comercial Greenvic S A v. Oneonta Trading Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff: Comercial Greenvic S A
Defendant: Oneonta Trading Corporation, James Thomas, Josh Weldy and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Pizzuto v. Tewalt, et al.
as 24-2275
Plaintiff: GERALD ROSS PIZZUTO, JR.
Defendant: JOSH TEWALT, Director, Idaho Department of Correction, in his official capacity and TYRELL DAVIS, Warden, Idaho Maximum Security Institution, in his official capacity
Feusi v. Centurion of Idaho, LLC, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff: David Feusi
Defendant: Centurion of Idaho, LLC, Dr. Kate Wilks, Chad Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pugh v. City of Antioch et al
as 4:2024cv01774
Plaintiff: Terryonn Deshann Pugh
Defendant: CIty of Antioch, Tammany Brooks, Officer Tony Morefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?