Cases 1 - 10 of 35
International Council for Veterinary Assessment v. Anvivive Lifesciences Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02866
Plaintiff:
International Council for Veterinary Assessment
Defendant:
Anvivive Lifesciences Inc, David Bruyette, Cody Arbuckle and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
(PC) Coleman v. Goff et al
as 2:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Andrew Coleman and Andrew James Coleman
Defendant:
Alexander Goff, Karina Golosinskiy, Lucas Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arbuckle v. Saul
as 4:2021cv05098
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Arbuckle
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
(PS) Bernhard et al v. County of San Joaquin et al
as 2:2021cv00948
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Thomas Bernhard, II and Stephanie Celeste Tejada-Otero
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin, Danevia Rhone, Leslie Billings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernhard et al v. County of San Joaquin et al
as 2:2021cv00172
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin Sheriff's Department, County of San Joaquin, Danevia Rhone and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Thomas Bernhard, II and Stephanie Celeste Tejada-Otero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Shahin Safae Manesh v. City of Beverly Hills et al
as 2:2020cv07427
Plaintiff:
Shahin Safae Manesh
Defendant:
Officer Kevin Arbuckle, City of Beverly Hills, Beverly Hills Police Department and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Richard Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arbuckle v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv05665
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
William L. Arbuckle
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Campbell v. Arbuckle et al
as 2:2017cv02385
Plaintiff:
Keith Steven Campbell
Defendant:
Christopher Arbuckle, Darren Anderson, County of Sacramento and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
