Cases 1 - 10 of 385
Overstreet v. Lucid USA Incorporated
as 2:2024cv01356
Petitioner:
Cornele A Overstreet
Respondent:
Lucid USA Incorporated
(PC) Murillo v. Covello, et al.
as 2:2024cv01593
Plaintiff:
Cixto Cruz Murillo
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, Mr. Canelo, Stephanie Cornell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Koken-ji Temple et al
as 2:2024cv04684
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Koken-ji Temple, Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Warren Buffett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Herzog, et al.
as 24-3394
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD SCOTT, III
Defendant:
Sgt FNU HERZOG, #17 SAC, FLURHER, #13 AC, #17 SAC, CRAIG, #13 AC, #17 SAC and others
Jones, et al. v. City of North Las Vegas, et al.
as 24-3374
Plaintiff:
GENOA JONES and CORNELL TINSLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, SCOTT SALKOFF and MICHAEL ROSE
(PC) Jackson v. Pouge, et al.
as 1:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Cornel Jackson
Defendant:
Tyson Pouge, Esteves, Cpt. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson, et al. v. City of Federal Way Police Department, et al.
as 24-2556
Plaintiff:
LAURA LEAH JACKSON and CORNELL STEFON DIJOHN BERRY, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY POLICE DEPARTMENT, INDIGO REAL ESTATE, other Tony Flaherty LLC and RESERVE AT SEATAC
Jackson v. Quick, et al.
as 24-1740
Plaintiff:
CORNEL JACKSON
Defendant:
JASON QUICK, Watch Commander at Madera County Jail, ELIZABETH ALVAREZ, CSU Officer at Madera County Jail, LISETTE LOPEZ, Mailroom Officer at Madera County Jail and others
Murillo v. Covello et al
as 1:2024cv01787
Plaintiff:
Cixto Cruz Murillo
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Covello, Mr. Canelo, Stephanie Cornell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornell, et al. v. Montgomery
as 24-1304
Petitioner:
QUIAD AKEEM CORNELL
Respondent:
WARREN L. MONTGOMERY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
