Cases 1 - 10 of 2,190
Hamm v. Dogtopia Enterprises LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01493
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Hamm
Defendant:
Dogtopia Enterprises LLC, Neil Gill, Unknown Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Roberson v. Bennett
as 24-3285
Petitioner:
NEIL JAMES ROBERSON
Respondent:
JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Alfredo Ramirez et al v. AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Ramirez and Ramn Santos Castro
Defendant:
AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc., Charles E. Parks, III, John D. Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Valley Pizza, Inc. v. Herbst et al
as 3:2024cv02934
Plaintiff:
Valley Pizza, Inc.
Defendant:
John A. Herbst, Allen M. Toy, Neil Cortesi and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7431 Taxpayer wrongful disclosure
Valley Pizza, Inc. v. Herbst et al
as 3:2024cv02922
Plaintiff:
Valley Pizza, Inc.
Defendant:
John A. Herbst, Allen M. Toy, Neil Cortesi and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7431 Taxpayer wrongful disclosure
Valley Pizza, Inc. v. Herbst et al
as 3:2024cv02926
Plaintiff:
Valley Pizza, Inc.
Defendant:
John A. Herbst, Allen M. Toy, Neil Cortesi and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7431 Taxpayer wrongful disclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Law v. Chu et al
as 3:2024cv02870
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gilbert Law
Defendant:
Neil Chu, R. Muniz and Elizabeth Kita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kitchens v. Whisenhunt et al
as 5:2024cv02620
Plaintiff:
Neil G. Kitchens
Defendant:
Teresa Kay Whisenhunt, Phillip Dwight Whisenhunt, Rhonda Burks Joodi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Ehresman et al v. Kia America, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00775
Plaintiff:
Neil Ehresman and Robert Beattie
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
