Cases 1 - 10 of 1,582
Walker v. Adams et al
as 5:2024cv03314
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Walker and Jeffrey Walker
Defendant:
Chief Adams, Sgt. Callaway, Lt. Clasal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Mente v. Traveon Rogers et al
as 2:2024cv04470
Plaintiff:
Michael Mente
Defendant:
Traveon Rogers, Scott Oliver and Scott Oliver Law LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
CP IV 9 Olive, LLC v. Keimora Nettles et al
as 2:2024cv04340
Plaintiff:
CP IV 9 Olive, LLC
Defendant:
Keimora Nettles and Dale Sawyers
Zayas v. LaRose et al
as 2:2024cv00695
Plaintiff:
Myriam Zayas
Defendant:
Paul LaRose, Olive Crest Adoption Agency and Issaquah School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-3147
Petitioner:
RONALD ROSS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and RONALD OLIVER
Cruz v. Oliver, et al.
as 24-3013
Petitioner:
CARIM CRUZ
Respondent:
RONALD OLIVER, Substituted in Place of William Hutching per [40] Order., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and WILLIAM HUTCHINGS, Substituted by Ronald Oliver per [40] Order.
Smith v. USA
as 2:2024cv00846
Petitioner:
William Oliver Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Oliver v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05329
Plaintiff:
James Oliver
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Oliver v. Campbell
as 24-2696
Petitioner:
ANTHONY C. OLIVER
Respondent:
TAMMY L. CAMPBELL, Warden of California State Prison, Corcoran
Blockson v. Oliver
as 2:2024cv00809
Petitioner:
Christopher Leonard Blockson
Respondent:
Ronald Oliver and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
