Cases 1 - 10 of 1,781
(HC) Watson v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00567
Petitioner:
Dale William Watson
Respondent:
Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allan Watson v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv03803
Defendant:
Gracelight Community Health, The United States of America, Goretti Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Allan Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Harper v. Amur Equipment Finance, Inc, et al.
as 24-2413
Plaintiff:
JOHN HARPER
Defendant:
AMUR EQUIPMENT FINANCE, INC, WATSON & CHELIN MANUFACTERING, INC and ARTISAN AND TRUCKERS CASUALTY COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Watson v. National Gypsum Company et al
as 3:2024cv02142
Plaintiff:
Justin Watson
Defendant:
National Gypsum Company, National Gypsum Services Company and Gold Bond Building Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Watson v. USA
as 4:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
Daniel Wayne Watson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Eaves Artesia, LP v. Cedric Watson
as 2:2024cv02589
Plaintiff:
Eaves Artesia, LP
Defendant:
Cedric Watson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
