Cases 1 - 10 of 362
Crow LLC v. Bayeh et al
as 2:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Crow LLC
Defendant:
Edgar Bayeh, Zilla Management LLC and Thomas Bayeh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Bayeh v. Crow
as 2:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Edgar Bayeh
Defendant:
Stephen E. Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Sherman v. Kruse et al
as 2:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Janet Shellman Sherman
Defendant:
James A Kruse doing business as Island Pie Restaurant, Margaret Weidner, Dennis Schilling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Property Damage
Kabisch v. RealPage Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kabisch
Defendant:
RealPage Inc, Thoma Bravo Fund XIII LP, Thoma Bravo Fund XIV LP and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fc Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
West v. Cortez, et al.
as 24-928
Plaintiff:
JERRY WEST, JR.
Defendant:
CORTEZ, CROW, BRIAN KIBLER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
In re: Subpoena Directed to Sandeep Sahota by Crowe LLP
as 3:2024mc80040
Not Yet Classified:
Sandeep Sahota
Respondent:
Crowe LLP
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Dr. Dre et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Defendant:
Neverland Rach, Wang Film Productions, Dr. Dre and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crow v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05000
Plaintiff:
Dyllan Crow
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
