Cases 1 - 10 of 689
Lamps Plus, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv05112
Petitioner:
Lamps Plus, Inc. and BEIJING HANGYIZIKONG TECHNOLOGY INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Carrillo v. TCL North America et al
as 2:2024cv01368
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
TCL North America, Page Plus, Tracphone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
RS Real Estate Plus v. Jaime R. Sanchez et al
as 8:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
RS Real Estate Plus
Defendant:
Jaime R. Sanchez, Ana Zuniga Moreno, Ermer J. Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1) Notice of Removal - Rent, Lease & Ejectment
RS Real Estate Plus v. Jaime R. Senchez et al
as 8:2024cv01079
Plaintiff:
RS Real Estate Plus
Defendant:
Jaime R. Sanchez, Ana Zuniga Moreno, Ermer J. Sanchez and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
CAB Plus 1 Properties, LLC v. Kristina Belova et al
as 2:2024cv03124
Plaintiff:
CAB Plus 1 Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Kristina Belova, Geneva Erickson and Does 1 to 5
Carrillo v. Cricket Wireless et al
as 2:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Cricket Wireless, Homesite Insurance, Christopher Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
