Cases 1 - 10 of 1,095
(HC) Velasco Perez v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv01306
Petitioner:
Alfonso Velasco Perez
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Velasco Perez v. Phillips
as 1:2024cv00554
Petitioner:
Alfonso Velasco Perez
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rupp, et al. v. Bonta
as 24-2583
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RUPP, STEVEN DEMBER, CHERYL JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Alfonso Lepe v. Martin J. OMalley
as 5:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Lepe
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Cuper Development LLC et al v. City of Cudahy et al
as 2:2024cv02833
Plaintiff:
Cuper Development LLC, Go Cudahy LLC, Davina LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Cudahy, Alfonso Noyola, Elizabeth Alcantar and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mouzon v. Alameda County
as 4:2024cv01907
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Mouzon
Defendant:
Alameda County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diaz-Orosco v. Garland
as 24-1627
Petitioner:
JULIO ALFONSO DIAZ-OROSCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alex Alfonso Salaverria v. United States Of America
as 8:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Alex Alfonso Salaverria
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guerrero Valenzuela v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00382
Petitioner:
Marcos Alfonso Guerrero Valenzuela
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
