Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Miller, et al. v. Ford Motor Co.
as 2:2020cv01796
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Miller, Amber West, Evan West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
(PC)Hernandez v. Constable et al
as 2:2019cv02195
Defendant:
A. Constable, J. Serwanga and S. Sharma
Plaintiff:
Cesar N. Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Cyprian v. Constable et al
as 2:2019cv00689
Defendant:
T. Constable, Second Watch Officer and S. Amador
Plaintiff:
Realious Cyprian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Constable v. Newell et al
as 2:2018cv00221
Plaintiff:
Russell Constable
Defendant:
Clifford Newell, Paige Carnahan and Kate Christie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cruz et al v. City of Rocklin et al
as 2:2017cv01628
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Cruz , Lorenzo Antoine Cruz , Aquino Cruz and others
Defendant:
City of Rocklin, Chris Osborne, John Constable and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sonia Constable v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 2:2009cv05686
Plaintiff:
Sonia Constable and Sonia Constable
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America, Life Insurance Company of North America, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Its Subsidiary and Affiliated Companies Ltd Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Constable v. Hara
as 1:2009cv00029
Plaintiff:
Russell Cleo Constable
Defendant:
Kenneth J. Hara
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Constable v. Hara et al
as 1:2008cv00697
Plaintiff:
Russell Cleo Constable
Defendant:
Ken Hara and State Employees and Judicial Officers Presiding at Stanislaus County Court Offices
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Constable v. State of CA et al
as 1:2007cv00995
Plaintiff:
Russell Cleo Constable
Defendant:
State of CA, Stanislaus County, Lisa Constant Dickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
