Cases 1 - 10 of 407
Tarango v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv01129
Plaintiff:
Jesus A Tarango
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Buckeye, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Howard v. Komaki, et al.
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
Emi Komaki, BD Young, C Caldua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delgado, et al. v. ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan
as 24-1845
Plaintiff:
ANGELINA BOWEN DELGADO, ROBIN BECERRA, STEVE BOZAN and others
Defendant:
ILWU-PMA WELFARE PLAN, an employee health and welfare plan under he Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Paz-Galindo v. Garland
as 24-1534
Petitioner:
FERNANDO PAZ-GALINDO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Shallowhorn v. Carrillo et al
as 3:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Alfred E. Shallowhorn
Defendant:
J. Carrillo, F. Nunez, J. Galindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jorge Galindo Espitia v. McLaren Automotive, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01295
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galindo Espitia
Defendant:
McLaren Automotive, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Enciso v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01965
Petitioner:
Guillermo Galindo Enciso
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PC) Sykes v. Galindo et al
as 1:2023cv01770
Plaintiff:
Troy Sykes
Defendant:
Galindo, Vasquez, Gasca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chitay-Cante, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4323
Petitioner:
EDUARDO CHITAY-CANTE, WENDY ELIZABETH ARCHILA-PEREZ, CRISTHIAN ALEXANDER GALINDO-ARCHILA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jack Chau et al v. Rosario Galindo et al
as 2:2023cv09724
Plaintiff:
Jack Chau and Shung Lui
Defendant:
Rosario Galindo, Jaime Guijarro, Aldo Rivers and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
