Cases 1 - 10 of 1,097
Avila v. Solis Enterprises 3 LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01180
Plaintiff:
Rita Lucila Amaya Avila
Defendant:
Solis Enterprises 3 LLC, Adolfo B Solis and Rosa M Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Solis v. Luna et al
as 2:2024cv01116
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Solis
Defendant:
Marvin Luna, Martin Luna, New Mexico, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Solis Vaquerano v. Sams West, Inc.
as 2:2024cv04040
Plaintiff:
Ana Marina Solis Vaquerano
Defendant:
Sams West, Inc. doing business as Sams Club doing business as Walmart, Inc. and Does 1 to 50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Solis Miranda v. Garland
as 24-2816
Petitioner:
MARCO SOLIS MIRANDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Federal Trade Commission, et al. v. Barron, et al.
as 24-2408
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION
Defendant:
ARMANDO SOLIS BARRON, MICHAEL NABATI, DOMINIC AHIGA and others
Castro Solis v. Garland
as 24-2414
Petitioner:
WILBER ERNESTO CASTRO SOLIS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Solis, et al. v. T-Mobile US, Inc., et al.
as 24-2412
Plaintiff:
JANNET SOLIS, MICHAEL ORTEGA, ADVANCED WEIGHT LOSS SURGICAL ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
T-MOBILE US, INC. and UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
