Cases 1 - 10 of 2,872
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Godfrey v. Costner, et al.
as 24-3415
Plaintiff:
DIANE K. GODFREY
Defendant:
KEVIN COSTNER, HARRISON FORD, SPENCER WRIGHT and others
(HC) Young v. Wright
as 2:2024cv01524
Petitioner:
Corvin J. Young
Respondent:
Chuck Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Wright v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2024cv01123
Plaintiff:
James Wright
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gwendolyn Hall v. Alicia G. Rosenberg et al
as 2:2024cv04396
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hall
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, Federal Judge Otis Wright, KTLA-TV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Campbell v. Fhuere et al
as 6:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
Tai'Von Campbell
Defendant:
Superintendent Corey Fhuere, Lieutenant P. Wright, Sergeant Joseph Summers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 3:2024cv03173
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Mosley, Amy Caster, Amy Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rivera v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv00872
Plaintiff:
Christian Rivera
Defendant:
County of San Diego, John Wright and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Woodhouse v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3070
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands, Havensight Capital L.L.C., A U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., DISTRICT JUDGE, Acting as a Government Official, a California citizen, R. GARY KLAUSNER, DISTRICT JUDGE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
