Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
CIVIL RIGHTS EDUCATION AND ENFORCEMENT CENTER, AL OTRO LADO AND TEXAS CIVIL RIGHTS PROJECT v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (USCBP)
as 2:2024cv03815
Plaintiff: CIVIL RIGHTS EDUCATION AND ENFORCEMENT CENTER, AL OTRO LADO AND TEXAS CIVIL RIGHTS PROJECT
Respondent: U.S. Customs and Border Protection (USCBP)
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Center for Gender & Refugee Studies et al v. US Customs and Border Protection
as 3:2024cv01601
Plaintiff: Center for Gender & Refugee Studies and Al Otro Lado, Inc.
Defendant: US Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Al Otro Lado, Inc. et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2023cv01367
Plaintiff: Al Otro Lado, Inc., Haitian Bridge Alliance, Diego Doe and others
Defendant: Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Troy A. Miller and Diane J. Sabatino
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Al Otro Lado, et al v. Executive Office for Immigration Review, et al
as 22-56036
Plaintiff / Appellant: AL OTRO LADO, a California corporation, ABIGAIL DOE, BEATRICE DOE and others
Appellee: EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
Defendant / Appellee: ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of Homeland Security, CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and PETE FLORES, Executive Assistant Commissioner of CBP's Office of Field Operations, in their official capacities
Al Otro Lado, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-55988
Plaintiff / Appellee: AL OTRO LADO, a California corporation, ABIGAIL DOE, BEATRICE DOE and others
Appellant: EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
Defendant / Appellant: ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of Homeland Security, CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), PETE FLORES, Executive Assistant Commiser of CBP's Office of Field Operations, in their official capacities and others
Al Otro Lado, Inc. v. US Customs and Border Protection et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01450
Plaintiff: Al Otro Lado, Inc. and Al Otro Lado
Defendant: US Customs and Border Protection, US IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Tammy Jane Owen et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 2:2022cv00550
Plaintiff: Al Otro Lado, Inc.
Estate Plaintiff: Tammy Jane Owen
Defendant: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), U.S. Department of Homeland Security-Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, U.S. Department of Homeland Security - Office of Inspector General and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Faour Fraihat, et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E, et al
as 21-55941
Plaintiff / Appellee: FAOUR ABDALLAH FRAIHAT, MARCO MONTOYA AMAYA, RAUL ALCOCER CHAVEZ and others
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Al Otro Lado, Inc. v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 2:2021cv03462
Defendant: Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties and others
Plaintiff: Al Otro Lado, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Centro Legal de la Raza et al v. Executive Office for Immigration Review et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00463
Defendant: Jeffrey A. Rosen, United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff: Tahirih Justice Center, Immigrant Legal Resource Center, Centro Legal de la Raza and others
Amicus Curiae: Alameda County Public Defender's Office, University of California, Los Angeles Immigration Law Clinic, Former Immigration Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?