Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Singh v. Jonas et al
as 4:2024cv02162
Defendant:
Jaswinder Singh Bains, Priyanka Chopra Jonas, Tiger Shroff and others
Plaintiff:
Gurpreet Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1154 Immigration: Procedure for Granting Immigration Status
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
James v. City of Oroville et al
as 2:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Dana Marie James
Defendant:
City of Oroville, Robert Sasek and Ali Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Khan v. Frauenheim
as 2:2015cv01050
Petitioner:
Mustaq Ali Khan
Respondent:
S. Frauenheim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Servida v. Alliance Bancorp et al
as 1:2013cv00555
Plaintiff:
Jose Aly Khan Roxas Servida
Defendant:
Alliance Bancorp, LaSalle Bank National Association, JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Muhammad Khan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73671
Petitioner:
MUHAMMAD ALI KHAN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Qadome et al v. Celcite Management Solutions, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv05253
Plaintiff:
Maher Qadome , Saqib Hussain and Hassan Ali Khan
Defendant:
Celcite Management Solutions, LLC and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences, Inc. v. For Less Corp. et al
as 2:2010cv08713
Defendant:
For Less Corp. and Zafaryab Ali Khan
Plaintiff:
National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences, Inc.
Khan v. Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv00999
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Ali Khan
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Robert Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
