Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smith v. Superior Court of California County of Alameda et al
as 3:2024cv01981
Plaintiff:
Andrea Smith
Defendant:
Superior Court of California County of Alameda, People of the State of California, Judge Stuart Hing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Redeaux et al v. Wise et al
as 3:2024cv01979
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Redeaux, Andrea Smith and Pamela Jones
Defendant:
Noel Wise, Rebekah Evenson, Sarah Standard-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(SS) Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Yvette Andrea Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Redeaux et al v. Hasselbacher et al
as 4:2023cv06097
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Redeaux, Andrea Smith and Samuel Smith
Defendant:
Garry Hasselbacher, Amy Kaufman, Quadratss LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Progressive Produce LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01597
Plaintiff:
Andrea Smith
Defendant:
Progressive Produce LLC, Thomson International Incorporated and Trader Joe's Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv01282
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Andrea Smith
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00959
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Windsor at Metropolitan LP v. Smith
as 3:2018cv01191
Plaintiff:
Windsor at Metropolitan LP
Defendant:
Andrea Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Homedics USA Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00379
Plaintiff:
Andrea Smith
Defendant:
Homedics USA Inc and Does 1 to 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
