Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kerr-Daly v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2022cv01144
Plaintiff:
Eamonn Kerr-Daly and Sarah Kerr-Daly
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Craig Wright, David Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Payne v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2022cv00471
Plaintiff:
Anzhelika Payne
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Lane County, Jairo Solorio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lobo v. Miller
as 2:2021cv01529
Petitioner:
Andrew Robert Lobo
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brand v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv00389
Plaintiff:
Andrew Robert Brand
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Dental et al v. City of Salem Police Department et al
as 3:2013cv01659
Plaintiff:
Bales And Brady Towing West, LLC, Gary Dental, Timothy Hall and others
Defendant:
City of Keizer Police Department, City of Salem Police Department, Tyson Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dental et al v. City of Salem Police Department et al
as 0:2013cv01659
Plaintiff:
Bales And Brady Towing West, LLC, Gary Dental, Timothy Hall and others
Defendant:
City of Keizer Police Department, City of Salem Police Department, Tyson Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrew Robert Ramirez v. Unnamed Respondents
as 5:2012cv01472
Petitioner:
Andrew Robert Ramirez
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondents
Ramirez v. Unnamed Respondents
as 3:2012cv01985
Petitioner:
Andrew Robert Ramirez
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lobo v. Tu, et al
as 3:2012cv00594
Defendant:
David Bowman, John and Jane Does 1-10, Christine Popoff and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Robert Lobo
503) 222-7529 (fax:
Janet Lee Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
