Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Ramirez-Tecorralco v. Garland
as 24-2150
Petitioner: ANGEL RAMIREZ-TECORRALCO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez-Ruiz v. Garland
as 21-1374
Petitioner: MIGUEL ANGEL RAMIREZ-RUIZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez v. Dzurenda et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00439
Petitioner: Miguel Angel Ramirez
Respondent: James Dzurenda, Christopher Dericco, Russell Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00735
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miguel Ramirez v. William Barr
as 20-73088
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner: MIGUEL ANGEL RAMIREZ
Robert Ramirez v. Karen Barcklay, et al
as 20-15822
Defendant: CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of A.D.O.C., CORIZON HEALTH, JOSEPH BRISBOIS, Nurse Practioner at A.D.O.C. Yuma Cibola Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROBERT ANGEL RAMIREZ
Defendant / Appellee: KAREN BARCKLAY, Medical Provider at A.D.O.C. Yuma Complex
Angel Ramirez et al v. County of Riverside et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00369
Plaintiff: Angel Ramirez, Angel Cadena and Alberto Ramirez
Defendant: Michelle Louise Morris, Edward Lawrence Kerin, Edward Lawrence Morris Kerin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miguel Ramirez v. William Barr We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-72784
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner: MIGUEL ANGEL RAMIREZ
USA v. Mendez
as 5:2018mj00321
Material Witne: Crisanto Acosta-Bermudez, Moise Maya Pala, Nestor Perez-Antonio and others
Defendant: Jose Guillermo Mendez (1)
Plaintiff: USA
Jose Guillermo Mendez
as 5:2018mj00321
Material Witne: Crisanto Acosta-Bermudez, Moise Maya Pala, Nestor Perez-Antonio and others
Defendant: Jose Guillermo Mendez (1)
Plaintiff: USA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?