Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Martins v. Garland
as 23-363
Petitioner:
DJALMA ANTONIO MARTINS, JR.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jose Martin del Campo Romero v. Merrick Garland
as 21-70945
Petitioner:
JOSE ANTONIO MARTIN DEL CAMPO ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Jose Martin del Campo Romero v. Merrick Garland
as 21-70902
Petitioner:
JOSE ANTONIO MARTIN DEL CAMPO ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
USA v. Fredy Martin-Chel
as 19-50247
Defendant / Appellant:
FREDY ANTONIO MARTIN-CHEL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stetson v. Martines et al
as 3:2018cv01753
Defendant:
Antonio Martines and Wells Fargo Bank
Plaintiff:
Joseph Arthur Stetson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Del Campo Santiesteban v. Steven Stafford
as 14-56679
Petitioner - Appellee:
ANTONIO MARTIN DEL CAMPO SANTIESTEBAN
Respondent - Appellant:
STEVEN C. STAFFORD, United States Marshal
Epigmenio Rios-Sierra v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-72503
Petitioner:
EPIGMENIO RIOS-SIERRA, AKA Juan Garcia, AKA Antonio Martines, AKA Epimenio Rios, AKA Sergio Rosales
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Ruben Arellano et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05638
Plaintiff:
Ruben Arellano, Evanury Arocho, Samuel Briggs and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Michelle Moss, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 14-56084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHELLE MOSS, an individual, MARY ANN GILBERT, an individual and J. R., a minor, individually by and through his Guardian Ad Litem Mary Ann Gilbert, a minor, as the successor-in-interest to the Estate of Colby Baker, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem Mary Ann Gilbert
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LIZETTE MAKARENKO, an individual, RYAN CAPLETTE, an individual and others
Del Campo Santiesteban v. Stafford
as 3:2014cv00529
Petitioner:
Antonio Martin Del Campo Santiesteban
Respondent:
Steven C. Stafford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
