Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Bogle v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv01593
Plaintiff:
Karol Shadowvine Bogle
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Scott Bogle v. Direct Recovery Services, LLC
as 5:2022cv01272
Plaintiff:
Scott Bogle
Defendant:
Direct Recovery Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bogle v. Regal Colonnade et al
as 2:2022cv01054
Plaintiff:
DAVID BOGLE
Defendant:
REGAL COLONNADE, REGAL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., REGAL CINEMAS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35508
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
UMB Bank NA v. Harvest Gold Silica Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01105
Plaintiff:
UMB Bank NA
Defendant:
Harvest Gold Silica Incorporated, Vast Mountain Development Incorporated, Solid Gold Incorporated and others
BOGLE v. WONOLO INC., a Delaware corporation,
as 2:2021cv08873
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BOGLE
Defendant:
WONOLO INC., a Delaware corporation,
Christopher Bogle v. Wonolo Inc.
as 2:2021cv08878
Plaintiff:
BOGLE CHRISTOPHER and Christopher Bogle
Defendant:
WONOLO INC., a Delaware corporation, and Wonolo Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
