Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Allen v. Talen Pizza, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen
Defendant:
Talen Pizza, Inc. and Troy C. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Nez Perce et al v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2020cv00018
Defendant:
P. Broker, B. Hicks, D. Burleigh and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Nez Perce, V and Freddie Gonzales-Valentine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur Hamilton v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 19-17456
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR C. HAMILTON
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY FRANKLIN, OLD REPUBLIC DEFAULT MANAGEMENT SERVICES and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Arthur Hamilton v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 19-17219
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR C. HAMILTON
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY FRANKLIN, OLD REPUBLIC DEFAULT MANAGEMENT SERVICES and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
United States of America v. Hamilton et al
as 4:2019cv00070
Defendant:
Roosevelt County, Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc. and Emily C Hamilton
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Hamilton v. Davis et al
as 3:2019cv06319
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Hamilton
Defendant:
M. Deseo, R. Chen, S. Garrigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N. A. et al
as 5:2019cv03722
Plaintiff:
Arthur C. Hamilton
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N. A., Old Republic Default Management Services and Shirley Franklin
Brown v. Tubbs et al
as 5:2018cv06893
Defendant:
M Douglas, M Stouffer, A Escobar and others
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 5:2018cv05164
Plaintiff:
Arthur C. Hamilton
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Old Republic Default Management Services and Shirley Franklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hamilton v. Davis
as 5:2016cv06314
Petitioner:
Paul C. Hamilton
Respondent:
Ron Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
