Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Mercury Insurance Services, LLC v. Curley
as 8:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
Mercury Insurance Services, LLC
Defendant:
Kevin Curley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Cadena v. Customer Connexx LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00233
Defendant:
ARCA, Inc., Customer Connexx LLC and JanOne Inc.
Plaintiff:
Danielle Curley, Cariene Cadena and Andrew Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv08094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Garrison v. ALPHABET, INC et al
as 3:2022cv01426
Plaintiff:
Paul Garrison
Defendant:
ALPHABET, INC, Google LLC, Outten & Golden, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Curley v. Par Electrical Contractors, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01200
Defendant:
Does 1-10 and Par Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Korey Curley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 lm
Jose Avila et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv05223
Plaintiff:
Hazel Benhamed-Masri, Alfredo Vega, Jose Avila and others
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Curley Broussard, Jr. v. USA
as 21-71066
Petitioner:
CURLEY JOHN BROUSSARD, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Barth v. Mabry Carlton Ranch, Inc et al
as 5:2020cv09288
Defendant:
Longino Ranch, Inc., Mabry Carlton Ranch, Inc, Eric Sutton and others
Plaintiff:
John S Barth and John Barth
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
