Cases 1 - 10 of 1,296
Garces v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-3166
Plaintiff:
LUIS MANUEL GARCES
Defendant:
M. GAMBOA, KERN KLARK, D. HERNANDEZ and others
Marin v. Catano, et al.
as 24-3175
Plaintiff:
MEL M. MARIN
Defendant:
KRISTINE CATANO, in their official and personal capacity, ADELA DE LA TORRE, in their official and personal capacity, VANESSA RUIZ, in their official and personal capacity and others
Cameron Anthony Morris v. California State Prison Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2024cv04036
Plaintiff:
Cameron Anthony Morris
Defendant:
California State Prison Los Angeles County and M. Salazar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwin Hamid Nahavandi v. Board of Trustees of The California State University et al
as 2:2024cv03791
Plaintiff:
Edwin Hamad Nahavandi
Defendant:
Board of Trustees of The California State University, Erika Drew Beck, Zeina Otaky Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hall v. California State University - Los Angeles
as 24-2812
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY - LOS ANGELES
Oliver v. Campbell
as 24-2696
Petitioner:
ANTHONY C. OLIVER
Respondent:
TAMMY L. CAMPBELL, Warden of California State Prison, Corcoran
Hall v. California State Board of Pharmacy
as 24-2627
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY
Gwendolyn Hall v. California State Board of Pharmacy
as 2:2024cv02986
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hall
Defendant:
California State Board of Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
DePriest v. Andes
as 24-2261
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY DEPRIEST
Respondent:
CHANCE ANDES, Acting Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin
Carrillo v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Unknown Party, Pam Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
