Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Carrasco v. Gattone
as 4:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Carrasco
Defendant:
Paul Gattone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrasco v Jove et al
as 4:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Carrasco
Defendant:
Lorence Jove, Tucson Police Department and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrasco v. Pima County Jail et al
as 4:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Carrasco
Defendant:
Pima County Jail, Pima County Sheriff's Department, Pima County Adult Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrasco v. Jove et al
as 4:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Carrasco
Defendant:
L Jove, Jr., Paul Gattone, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carrasco v. Unknown Parties et al
as 4:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Carrasco
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Pima County Sheriff's Department, Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Carrasco v. Unknown Parties et al
as 4:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Carrasco
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gamez #131401 v. Shinn
as 4:2022cv00197
Petitioner:
Robert Carrasco Gamez, Jr.
Respondent:
David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Valentini #268586 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05608
Defendant:
Unknown Schitter, David Martin, Unknown Robles and others
Plaintiff:
Rick Valentini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrasco-Ferrel v. Penzone et al
as 2:2019cv05120
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Unknown Party
Plaintiff:
Steven Carrasco-Ferrel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
