Cases 1 - 7 of 7
In re California Gasoline Spot Market Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2020cv03131
Plaintiff:
Pacific Wine Distributors, Inc., Bogard Construction, Inc., Vincent Cendejas and others
Defendant:
SK Trading International Co. Ltd., SK Energy Americas, Inc., Vitol Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Craig Kelly, Carpe Carma, LLC, Marie E. Richardson and others
Not Classified By Court:
The People of the State of California, All Parties, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnston v. Vitol Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv03238
Plaintiff:
Casler Johnston
Defendant:
SK Energy Americas, Inc., Vitol Inc. and SK Trading International Co. Ltd.
Interested Party:
Pacific Wine Distributors, Inc., Vincent Cendejas, Fricke-Parks Press, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Cristal Casler v. Department of the Interior, et al
as 19-15994
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRISTAL LEE CASLER
Defendant / Appellee:
RYAN K. ZINKE, in his Official Capacity as Secretary, Department of the Interior and DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Lewellyn Cox, IV v. USA, et al
as 19-55170
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES MIKKELSON, Secret Service Agent, CURT CASLER, Sheriff Detective, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEWELLYN CHARLES COX IV, AKA Sho, AKA Showtime, AKA Showtyme
Petitioner:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and POMONA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant:
JOSEPH T. MCNALLY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
