Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01361
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Charles Granderson, Jr.
as 20-10407
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES EARL GRANDERSON, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Charles Granderson, Jr. v. USA
as 20-71644
Petitioner:
CHARLES EARL GRANDERSON, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Granderson v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2017cv00655
Defendant:
Greg Ashby, Eric Koch and Daniel Wheeler
Plaintiff:
Charles Earl Granderson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Granderson v. USA
as 3:2017cv00671
Petitioner:
Charles Earl Granderson, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Granderson v. Wheeler et al
as 2:2016cv02237
Defendant:
Greg Ashby, Eric Koch and Daniel Wheeler
Plaintiff:
Charles Earl Granderson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Charles Granderson, Jr.
as 16-10391
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES EARL GRANDERSON, Jr.
Baker v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 2:2016cv00729
Plaintiff:
Charles Earl Baker
Defendant:
Correction Corporation of America, Central Arizona Detention Center, Central Arizona Detention Center Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn et al v. Watson Pharmaceuticals Incorporated et al
as 4:2011cv00407
Plaintiff:
Linda Vaughn, Anna Marie Vaughn, Joshua Anthony Vaughn and others
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Watson Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Watson Pharma Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Charles Earl Smith v. J. Salazar
as 2:2008cv06183
Petitioner:
Charles Earl Smith
Respondent:
J. Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
