Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Hamilton v. Davis, et al.
as 24-4162
Defendant:
RONALD BROOMFIELD, CLARENCE CRYER, SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL CHRISTOPHER HAMILTON
Jerome Christopher Hamilton v. Black and Sexy TV, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00954
Plaintiff:
Jerome Christopher Hamilton
Defendant:
Dennis Dortch, Black & Sexy TV, LLC, BSTV, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Hamilton v. Heavenly Valley, Limited Partnership
as 2:2021cv01608
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hamilton
Defendant:
Heavenly Valley, Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Smith v. Shinn et al
as 4:2021cv00104
Defendant:
Christopher Hamilton, David Shinn, Marcos Basurto and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00408
Defendant:
Christopher Hamilton, David Shinn, Marcos Basurto and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. James River Insurance Company
as 2:2018cv00142
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hamilton
Defendant:
James River Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jeannie Daniels v. Black and Sexy TV, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv09050
Defendant:
Black and Sexy TV, LLC, Does, Dennis Dortch and others
Plaintiff:
Jeanine Daniels
Christopher Hamilton v. General Mills, Inc., et al
as 16-36004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER HAMILTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
GENERAL MILLS, INC. and GENERAL MILLS SALES, INC.
Hamilton v. General Mills, Inc. et al
as 6:2016cv00382
Defendant:
General Mills Sales, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 cl Class Action Fairness Action - 2005
Hamilton v. Adragna
as 2:2015cv02641
Plaintiff:
Eric Christopher Hamilton
Defendant:
Rashel M. Adragna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
