Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Valame v. Biden, et al.
as 24-369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIKRAM VALAME
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, CRAIG T. BROWN, JOEL C. SPANGENBERG and others
Cox, et al. v. Rowland, et al.
as 4:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Cox, BW DOE, AW DOE and others
Defendant:
Craig T Rowland, Bingham County Sheriff's Dept., Frm. Sheriff Craig Rowland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Valame v. Biden et al
as 5:2023cv03018
Plaintiff:
Vikram Valame
Defendant:
Joseph Robinette Biden, Craig T. Brown, Joel C. Spangenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Urban v. Urban
as 4:2021cv09929
Plaintiff:
Scott T. Urban
Defendant:
Craig T. Urban and Allied Consultant, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Polatis v. Bingham County et al
as 4:2021cv00390
Plaintiff:
Christian John Polatis
Defendant:
Bingham County, Craig T. Rowland, Brock Katseanes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv08378
Plaintiff:
Craig T. Campbell
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Does v. Lawrence Wasden, et al
as 19-35391
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE RODRIGUEZ, Nez Perce County Sheriff, MATTHEW THOMAS, Sheriff, Sexual Offender Management Board, CRAIG T. ROWLAND, Bingham County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOES, John and Jane, 1-134
John and Jane Does 1-104 v. Wasden et al
as 1:2016cv00429
Defendant:
Lawrence Wasden, Kevin Kempf, Terry Kirkham and others
Plaintiff:
John and Jane Does 1-104
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dawson v. Aiken et al
as 6:2015cv01882
Defendant:
Aiken, T. Givens, Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Craig T. Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
