Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jermaine Howard v. Lucy Pearl, et al
as 23-55176
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMAINE JEVON HOWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
LUCY PEARL, BEYOND RECORDS, RAPHAEL SAADIQ and others
Jermaine Howard v. Lucy Pearl, et al
as 20-55959
Defendant / Appellee:
BEYOND RECORDS, RAPHAEL SAADIQ, DAWN ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMAINE JEVON HOWARD
Jermaine Jevon Howard v. Lucy Pearl et al
as 2:2020cv05880
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Jevon Howard
Defendant:
Ugmoe Music, Beyond Records, Raphael Saadiq and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Homebridge Financial Services, Inc. v. Martinson et al
as 1:2019cv00582
Defendant:
Jason Martinson and Dawn Robinson Naya
Plaintiff:
Homebridge Financial Services, Inc.
Robinson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv04094
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Dawn Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cindy Braggs et al v. Maxine Jones et al
as 2:2012cv08493
Plaintiff:
Cindy Braggs and Terry Ellis
Defendant:
Maxine Jones and Dawn Robinson
Aleta Goodwin, et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et al
as 11-17667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALETA ROSE GOODWIN, ROBERT PAUL MCARTOR, HEATHER GABEL and others
Intervenor:
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY AS CONSERVATOR OF FANNIE MAE AND FREDDIE MAC
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., RECONTRUST COMPANY, SAXON MORTGAGE, INC. and others
Robinson et al v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2008cv01855
Plaintiff:
Dawn Robinson and Noah Robinson
Defendant:
County of San Diego and DOES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robinson et al v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2008cv00798
Plaintiff:
Dawn Robinson and Noah Robinson
Defendant:
County of San Diego, William Yavno and Does 1-20, inclusive
Guardian Ad Litem:
Ricardo Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
