Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Andrew Kimbrough v. Douglas Waddington, et al
as 12-35460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW B. KIMBROUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS WADDINGTON, Superintendent, DON GRIFFITH, Health Care Manager, EDWARD DOMINIC, Correctional Officer and others
Parmelee v. Dunnington et al
as 3:2011cv05771
Plaintiff:
Allan Parmelee
Defendant:
Tony Dunnington , Harlan Finch , Douglas Waddington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2011cv01583
Plaintiff:
Allan Parmelee
Defendant:
Tony Dunnington , Harlan Finch , Douglas Waddington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robin Combs, Sr. v. Joseph Lehman, et al
as 11-35083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBIN BLAKE COMBS, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH D. LEHMAN, Secretary, CATHERINE KNOX, DOUGLAS WADDINGTON, Supt. and others
Andrew Kimbrough v. Douglas Waddington, et al
as 10-35721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW B. KIMBROUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS WADDINGTON, Superintendent, DON GRIFFITH, EDWARD DOMINIC, Correctional Officer and others
Steven McDonald v. USDCSEA
as 10-71217
:
In re: STEVEN DARBY MCDONALD
Petitioner:
STEVEN DARBY MCDONALD
Respondent:
USDC, SEATTLE
Real Party In Interest:
DOUGLAS WADDINGTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv05359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Simon v. Waddington et al
as 3:2008cv05597
Plaintiff:
Gregory Simon
Defendant:
Douglas Waddington and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kimbrough v. Waddington et al
as 3:2008cv05602
Plaintiff:
Andrew B Kimbrough
Defendant:
Douglas Waddington, Don Griffith, Edward Dominic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simon v. Waddington et al
as 2:2008cv00289
Plaintiff:
Gregory Simon
Defendant:
Douglas Waddington and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
