Cases 1 - 10 of 39,161
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Rowe v. H & R Block
as 3:2024cv03403
Plaintiff:
Richard David Rowe, Jr.
Defendant:
H & R Block
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Zito v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Jordan Zito
Defendant:
Ryan Sullivan, David Clifton, Washoe County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Kahl v. American Modern Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
David M. Kahl
Defendant:
American Modern Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Panabaker et al v. Hood River
as 3:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
Ruston Panabaker, Sheri Panabaker, John J Hutson and others
Defendant:
City of Hood River
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Coleman, et al. v. County of Kings, et al.
as 1:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Pearl Coleman, Mitchell Snell, Mamie Johnson and others
Defendant:
County of Kings, David Robinson, Wayne Brabant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellison v. Thornell, et al.
as 24-3527
Petitioner:
CHARLES DAVID ELLISON
Respondent:
RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry and JAMES O'NEIL, Warden - Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex
Weinberg v. Acutus Medical, Inc., et al.
as 24-3537
Plaintiff:
PAUL D. WEINBERG, Lead Plaintiff; Individually and On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
ACUTUS MEDICAL, INC., VINCE BURGESS and DAVID H. ROMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
