Cases 1 - 10 of 4,507
Diaz v. Nexa Mortgage, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Damian Diaz
Defendant:
Nexa Mortgage, LLC and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Diaz-Buitrago, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3125
Petitioner:
BRANDON DIAZ-BUITRAGO, VIKY ORREGO-GARCIA and MELANY LOPEZ-ORREGO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rhodes v. Ford
as 24-3106
Plaintiff:
KAVIN MAURICE RHODES
Defendant:
D. FORD, LTA, D. LUNSFORD, SSA, K. ROYAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Johnson et al v. Chandler Unified School District et al
as 2:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Johnson and Latonia Johnson
Defendant:
Chandler Unified School District, Yolanda Carreto Diaz, Dionicio Corte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cortez-Diaz v. Garland
as 24-2987
Petitioner:
DORA BEATRIZ CORTEZ-DIAZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kevin Allesee v. Sergeant George et al
as 2:2024cv03859
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allesee
Defendant:
Sergeant George, Officer Diaz, Officer Cabrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivas-Alvarado, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2947
Petitioner:
JOSE JUAN RIVAS-ALVARADO, ELSA VERONICA DIAZ-ALVARADO and DIEGO ALEXANDER RIVAS-DIAZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alexander v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-2942
Plaintiff:
ANAND JON ALEXANDER
Defendant:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR, MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, DANIEL PARAMO, former Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
