Cases 1 - 10 of 1,408
Bond v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Dwight Maurice Bond
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0402 Social Security Benefits
Kitchens v. Whisenhunt et al
as 5:2024cv02620
Plaintiff:
Neil G. Kitchens
Defendant:
Teresa Kay Whisenhunt, Phillip Dwight Whisenhunt, Rhonda Burks Joodi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
McNeil v. Molnar, et al.
as 24-2733
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCNEIL
Defendant:
DAVE MOLNAR, Investigator General, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, WILLIAM GLASS, Sergeant and others
Bouse v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
Dwight Bouse
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Simon v. Bountiful Company et al
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Jason Lewis Simon
Defendant:
The Bountiful Company, Nordic Naturals, Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Jackson v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1771
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JACKSON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, in relation to The Nevada Department of Corrections, E K MCDANIEL, DWIGHT WALTER NEVEN and others
Hill v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Dwight Hill
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harris v. King County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Dwight Harris
Defendant:
King County Jail, King County Chaplain Department, King County Public Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonetti v. Neven et al
as 2:2024cv00351
Petitioner:
Joseph Antonetti
Respondent:
Dwight Neven and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dwight Shelton v. Bryan Birkholz
as 2:2024cv01249
Petitioner:
Dwight Shelton
Respondent:
Bryan Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
