Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Durham et al v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01477
Plaintiff:
Stanley E. Durham and Joyce A. Durham
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 231
Eat Me Lures Inc. v. Cafepress LLC et al
as 6:2020cv01406
Defendant:
Phillip Millner, Fred E. Durham, Robert D. Barton and others
Plaintiff:
Eat Me Lures Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Durham v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv05113
Plaintiff:
Carl E Durham
Defendant:
United States of America and Unknown Named Employee(s) of the Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv02310
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Donna L Achey, et al v. Infoblox, Inc., et al
as 5:2014cv02644
Plaintiff:
Donna L Achey and Lindsay E Durham
Defendant:
Infoblox, Inc. , Robert D Thomas and Remo E Canessa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jinnah v. Cafepress Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv03668
Plaintiff:
Hussain Jinnah
Defendant:
Cafepress Inc. , Bob Marino, Monica N. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: SEC Act
Desmarairs v. Johnson et al
as 4:2013cv03666
Plaintiff:
Wallace Joseph Desmarairs, Jr.
Defendant:
Monica N. Johnson, Fred E. Durham, III, Brad W. Buss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: SEC Act
Holland v. Evans et al
as 3:2010cv02140
Plaintiff:
Everett Loberiest Holland
Defendant:
M. S. Evans, Fritz, P. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincente Ortiz v. California Department of Correction et al
as 2:2010cv02076
Defendant:
W. Baranik, W. Baranik, J. Berkey and others
Plaintiff:
Vincente Ortiz
Chong's Produce, Inc., v. Premium Fresh Farms, LLC et al
as 5:2009cv01013
Plaintiff:
Chong's Produce, Inc.,
Defendant:
Premium Fresh Farms, LLC, Emmitt Pfost, Salvador P Tarantino and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
